From owner-freebsd-current Mon May 10 1:54:46 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from herring.nlsystems.com (nlsys.demon.co.uk [158.152.125.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97F714F94 for ; Mon, 10 May 1999 01:54:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Received: from localhost (dfr@localhost) by herring.nlsystems.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA51678; Mon, 10 May 1999 09:54:49 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 09:54:49 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson To: Peter Jeremy Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: config(8) changes.. In-Reply-To: <99May10.120030est.40548@border.alcanet.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 10 May 1999, Peter Jeremy wrote: > Peter Wemm wrote: > >If you had old "vector xxxintr", it will now cause a syntax error rather than > >a warning. > > What is the new method of specifying a non-standard interrupt > function? I have some code (currently on 2.x, but I was hoping to be > able to move it) where I have different interrupt functions within the > same driver. I could use a single interrupt handler, but it would > mean either additional latency or overhead, which I'd like to avoid. Use the flags in the driver to select. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message