Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 21:09:38 -0600 From: Brandon Gooch <jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com> To: Benjamin Lee <ben@b1c1l1.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Joerg Pulz <Joerg.Pulz@frm2.tum.de> Subject: Re: [CFT+RFC] patch to buildworld with heimdal from ports Message-ID: <AANLkTin-H2k9jbOKJ5UL0rGC0txDhPnw6uUAYBOAfS6Z@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4CE1DB90.3000502@b1c1l1.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1011152143390.51792@unqrf.nqzva.sez2> <4CE1DB90.3000502@b1c1l1.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Benjamin Lee <ben@b1c1l1.com> wrote: > On 11/15/2010 02:08 PM, Joerg Pulz wrote: >> Hi, >> >> after the security/heimdal port was updated to the current heimdal >> release and i added one missing function from base it is now possible to >> completely buildworld src/ using the port for all Kerberos5/GSSAPI >> enabled parts. > > Hi Joerg, > > I don't think that having the base system depend on a port is the right > solution to resolving the libgssapi compatibility problems in base. > > Did you ever come across the old PR kern/147454 that I submitted in > June? =A0In it I included a src patch that replaced the base system's > libgssapi with upstream Heimdal's, which resolved all libgssapi > compatibility problems. =A0That patch is now stale, but either way I > haven't been able to draw enough attention to the issue to have it fixed. I guess we're waiting on someone to review the patch and commit it? Hopefully someone can get this in soon, before 8.2 is released. Is there something wrong with your patch? -Brandon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTin-H2k9jbOKJ5UL0rGC0txDhPnw6uUAYBOAfS6Z>