From owner-freebsd-security  Wed Aug 12 13:50:53 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA08863
          for freebsd-security-outgoing; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 13:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA08834
          for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 13:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from brett@lariat.org)
Received: (from brett@localhost)
	by lariat.lariat.org (8.8.8/8.8.6) id OAA02921;
	Wed, 12 Aug 1998 14:49:59 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199808122049.OAA02921@lariat.lariat.org>
X-Sender: brett@127.0.0.1
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1.0.44 (Beta)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 14:49:56 -0600
To: Pat Parrinello <pparri@crossfields.com>,
        "Marius Bendiksen" <Marius.Bendiksen@scancall.no>
From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
Subject: Re: UDP port 31337
Cc: <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
In-Reply-To: <199808122030.PAA02830@anne.crossfields.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

At 03:23 PM 8/12/98 -0500, Pat Parrinello wrote:

> Security is observing and taking action. 

I agree. However, not everyone agrees on what type of action
should be taken. I say there's nothing like a good watchdog.
With teeth.

--Brett


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message