From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 21:43:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 304C116A40F; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 21:43:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D48643DB8; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 21:40:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from sp34.ipt.ru ([217.147.20.50] helo=bs1.sp34.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GtWQi-000FQ4-MN; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:41:52 +0300 Received: from bsam by bs1.sp34.ru with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GtWS2-0000Pi-Na; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:43:14 +0300 To: Gabor Kovesdan References: <57799043@bs1.sp34.ru> <457C7C8C.6090609@FreeBSD.org> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:43:14 +0300 In-Reply-To: <457C7C8C.6090609@FreeBSD.org> (Gabor Kovesdan's message of "Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:30:52 +0100") Message-ID: <91717725@bs1.sp34.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: databases/dbf: is distfile corrupted? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 21:43:30 -0000 On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:30:52 +0100 Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > Boris Samorodov schrieb: > > I just tried to fetch/build databases/dbf. My tinderbox didn't show > > any error. Is the DEPRECATED message wrong? May be I misunderstand > > something? > > > > Thanks. > It showed up unfetchable on the distfile survey and I took a look at > this and could not extract the tarball, it was corrupt. It seems to be > solved now. I can remove the deprecated message, but it would be > better if someone else, who really uses this port would take care of > it. (I mean take maintainership, not just revert deprecation.) Maybe > are you interested in this? :) Done. ;-) Thanks for your answer. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve