From owner-freebsd-isdn Thu Oct 8 02:44:58 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA01930 for freebsd-isdn-outgoing; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 02:44:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from custos.callcenter.systemhaus.net ([62.152.9.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA01923 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 02:44:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from listmail@helena.callcenter.systemhaus.net) Received: (from smap@localhost) by custos.callcenter.systemhaus.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA15524; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 11:44:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from helena.otelo-call.de(194.233.120.14) by custos.otelo-call.de via smap (V2.0) id xma015522; Thu, 8 Oct 98 11:44:08 +0200 Received: (from listmail@localhost) by helena.otelo-call.de (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA29460; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 11:44:08 +0200 (MET DST) From: Christoph Weber-Fahr Message-Id: <199810080944.LAA29460@helena.otelo-call.de> Subject: Re: what's wrong with a1 and irq 2 ? In-Reply-To: <199810080638.IAA00402@RVC1.Informatik.BA-Stuttgart.DE> from Wolfgang Helbig at "Oct 8, 98 08:38:56 am" To: helbig@Informatik.BA-Stuttgart.DE (Wolfgang Helbig) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1998 11:44:08 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31H (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, (IRQ 2 is occupied by the second interrupt controller on an ISA system) Yep. The 'cascade interrupt'; I'm well aware of this, but this doesn't keep quite some periphery from using it. > IRQ 2 on the card's side is IRQ 9 on the processor's side.^ Does this mean the A1 should work with IRQ 9 despite it is jumpered for IRQ 2 ? Regards Christoph Weber-Fahr To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message