From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 00:30:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED7837B401 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2003 00:30:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.web.de (smtp02.web.de [217.72.192.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3832343FBF for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2003 00:30:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from g.w.k@web.de) Received: from [213.148.149.130] (helo=[172.17.22.32]) by smtp.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (WEB.DE 4.99 #433) id 19iUMU-0003Yi-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2003 09:30:03 +0200 From: "Georg-W. Koltermann" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1059722917.876.3.camel@hunter.muc.mscsoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 Date: 01 Aug 2003 09:28:38 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: g.w.k@web.de Subject: perforce usage by the FreeBSD project X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 07:30:06 -0000 Hi, I remember a long while ago, maybe two or three years, there was a lengthy thread about using P4 vs. CVS for the FreeBSD project. I believe it was on the -current list. At that time I didn't follow the thread, and now I cannot find it any more. If someone could drop me a pointer, or refer me to any other sound and fair comparison of CVS vs. P4. -- Thanks in advance, regards, Georg.