From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 3 08:01:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA0E16A420 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 08:01:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: from pastinakel.tue.nl (pastinakel.tue.nl [131.155.2.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8780743D45 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 08:01:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pastinakel.tue.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094FB14BCB6; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:01:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from pastinakel.tue.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pastinakel.tue.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57935-02; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:01:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from umta.win.tue.nl (umta.win.tue.nl [131.155.71.100]) by pastinakel.tue.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2229014BCD2; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:01:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (pcwin002 [131.155.71.72]) by umta.win.tue.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D0A231401C; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:01:21 +0100 (CET) Received: by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EDC1D409F; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:01:20 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:01:20 +0100 From: Stijn Hoop To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= Message-ID: <20060203080120.GB976@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Stijn Hoop , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= , Garrett Cooper , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43E2E2F1.70206@u.washington.edu> <20060203050813.GA45810@xor.obsecurity.org> <43E2F43B.1000303@u.washington.edu> <43E30BDD.9090005@cs.tu-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43E30BDD.9090005@cs.tu-berlin.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Bright-Idea: Let's abolish HTML mail! X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at tue.nl Cc: Garrett Cooper , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any idea when Xorg 7.0's coming to FBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 08:01:42 -0000 --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 08:53:01AM +0100, Bj=F6rn K=F6nig wrote: > Garrett Cooper schrieb: > > Erm, unless 6.9 is modular (which I didn't think was the case), there= =20 > > should be a noticeable difference. >=20 > The noticeable difference is that 7.0 takes much more time to compile=20 > all in all because of its modularity. A German magazine tested both: 6.9= =20 > took 19 minutes and 7.0 75 minutes on their dual Opteron 246 machine=20 > with 2 GB RAM (source: iX 1/2006). Heh :-) But the advantage *should* be that you don't need to recompile all of that every major upgrade. I don't know what will become of that ideal though, only time will tell I guess. --Stijn --=20 MY HATE OF D02 KNOW NO LIMIT -- A Silent Wail, http://forum.rpg.net/showthread.php?s=3D&threadid=3D31914 --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD4w3QY3r/tLQmfWcRAkWRAJ94RHbDUQ+px3DS1O6Z/di9oR0zWgCglx09 +pl+wox5dAIpAh9OTv/aGSY= =pGMw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o--