From owner-freebsd-smp  Fri Nov 29 11:42:04 1996
Return-Path: owner-smp
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA02017
          for smp-outgoing; Fri, 29 Nov 1996 11:42:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA02011
          for <freebsd-smp@freebsd.org>; Fri, 29 Nov 1996 11:42:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from critter.tfs.com by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) with SMTP
	id m0vTYoQ-0003vvC; Fri, 29 Nov 96 11:41 PST
Received: from critter.tfs.com (localhost.dk.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) with ESMTP id UAA03228; Fri, 29 Nov 1996 20:42:42 +0100 (MET)
To: Steve Passe <smp@csn.net>
cc: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.dialix.com>, Erich Boleyn <erich@uruk.org>,
        Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, freebsd-smp@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Pentium CPU steppings 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 29 Nov 1996 12:35:24 MST."
             <199611291935.MAA29466@clem.systemsix.com> 
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 1996 20:42:41 +0100
Message-ID: <3226.849296561@critter.tfs.com>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
Sender: owner-smp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>---
>note that both 1 & 2 have a feature value of 1bf, neither
>of which have the APIC bit set (bit #9).  2.1.0 claims the
>90mHz chip has an APIC, which I didn't expect, while 2.1.5
>claims it doesn't have an APIC, which is consistant with 1bf.

2.1.0 was bogus.  Somebody tried to use %b without using too much
time on the task.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@ref.tfs.com       TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.