From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 30 05:23:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 467B616A41F for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 05:23:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF7243D45 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 05:23:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so242849wxc for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 21:23:38 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=XBCaQAT+KMSY7fvEQ+HyZN58XkY112XxPk2VXStwlG+BBcAVgiouXcjMvaQ4B1wf4GHpukoYbz6K/SIE6724P52bsmaprKRdxpP/JpiDBzpoaFqlHtGfzSDJe86fqKlYRXwSkMVhFini7PjQ0bd4rnA3Lks81+vyQ/QJOCHn0dY= Received: by 10.70.131.5 with SMTP id e5mr715705wxd; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 21:23:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.57.15 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 21:23:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 23:23:38 -0600 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: Chris In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0603291148y5065754ag178e4dc7c9ee7986@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200603281234.11850.satyam@sklinks.com> <4429A37D.2020500@pixelhammer.com> <20060328213953.GA2682@xor.obsecurity.org> <4429B479.7000408@pixelhammer.com> <20060328224340.GA4063@xor.obsecurity.org> <442ACFB2.70108@pixelhammer.com> <20060329183051.GA78889@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060329190517.GA79103@xor.obsecurity.org> <3aaaa3a0603291148y5065754ag178e4dc7c9ee7986@mail.gmail.com> Cc: DAve , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Why are so many people using 4.x? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 05:23:39 -0000 On 3/29/06, Chris wrote: > On 29/03/06, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 01:30:51PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 01:19:30PM -0500, DAve wrote: > > > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > >On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 05:11:05PM -0500, DAve wrote: > > > > >>>modern, supported version of FreeBSD. > Well without a doubt 4.x is the fastest and most stable freebsd out of > the 3. Fuel on the fire, but: FreeBSD is useably, configurably, and stably moreso than what was before* on each and every (or all) of the "intel insides" I've on it putting (gerund). That's three gramatically wrong adverbs worth of tautology forwarming that bearskin rug Giada De Laurentiis should be sprawling on (enfirewise). Both times I was wondering, but shockwaif flash si teh b0nks and undeeded too. Trust me, no good publication would do such a thing. 4.11 since 4.x was 4.0, or however you yanks would say it. ^^^^ drm doesn't compile, tintin++-devel doesn't compile, myriads of myriads (with only 14k plus some odd it takes a math genius to make this number work) soon won't for lack of threads or summat. Whatever. *It didn't support uname, I don't know what it was. -- --