From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb 25 18:17:17 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D673C16A4CE
	for <doc@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:17:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from blue.host.is (blue.host.is [212.30.222.33])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CCD143D1D
	for <doc@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:17:17 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from martin@blue.host.is)
Received: by blue.host.is (Postfix, from userid 1004)
	id 4941A1E2; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 02:17:16 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 02:17:16 +0000
From: Martin Swift <martin@swift.is>
To: doc@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <20040226021716.GA13627@swift.is>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Subject: Use of the 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 02:17:18 -0000

Hi,

Came across what might be considered a somewhat strange usage of the
'acronym' tag on
  http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/acpi-overview.html
There the tag appears several times in the form
  <acronym class="ACRONYM">ACPI</acronym>
and not
  <acronym title="Advanced Configuration and Power
  Interface">ACPI</acronym>
which might be considered a slightly more common usage of the tag.
This is all the more strange since the class "ACRONYM" is not even
defined in the stylesheet (docbook.css).

Not that I'm complaining about the information content of the
handbook. Just thought I'd mention it since it looked a bit like an
oversight; putting *all* the acronyms into an acronym class without
defining it. Hmmm?

Sincerely,
Martin