From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 18 05:39:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707B616A4DC for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 05:39:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from istanbul.enderunix.org (freefall.marmara.edu.tr [193.140.143.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 27C0C43D55 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 05:39:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ofsen@enderunix.org) Received: (qmail 54721 invoked by uid 89); 18 Sep 2004 05:39:48 -0000 Message-ID: <20040918053948.54719.qmail@istanbul.enderunix.org> From: Omer Faruk Sen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 08:39:48 +0300 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-9" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: apache chroot or FreeBSD jail ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 05:39:54 -0000 Hi, I am planning to restrict apache to a spesific directory. But I am not sure if to install apache in chroot env or making a FreeBSD jail install ( say /usr/jail/freebsd_jail_ip). Which one is recommended for better security ? An artilcele in http://www.haught.org/freebsdapache.php says jail is better that just chroot environment. But I want to be sure to have your opinions about it and want be sure which one is better. Regards, ----------------------- Omer Faruk Sen http://www.EnderUNIX.ORG Software Development Team @ Turkey http://www.Faruk.NET For Public key: http://www.enderunix.org/ofsen/ofsen.asc ******************************************************** First Turkish FreeBSD book is out! Go check it. Duydunuz mu! Turkiye'nin ilk FreeBSD kitabi cikti. http://www.acikkod.com/freebsd.php