From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 05:58:09 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70069CCE; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 05:58:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onyx.glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:c200::face]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2637D6E6; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 05:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glenbarber.us (kaos.glenbarber.us [71.224.221.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by onyx.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A54F623F669; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 00:58:07 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.4 onyx.glenbarber.us A54F623F669 Authentication-Results: onyx.glenbarber.us; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 00:57:55 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: Giorgos Keramidas Subject: Re: Do we really need articles/cvs-freebsd anymore? Message-ID: <20130208055755.GE81339@glenbarber.us> References: <20130208055308.GA30647@saturn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4f28nU6agdXSinmL" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130208055308.GA30647@saturn> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 05:58:09 -0000 --4f28nU6agdXSinmL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 06:53:10AM +0100, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > Hi everyone, >=20 > Now that everything (src, ports, doc) has moved off CVS, does it make > sense to keep articles/cvs-freebsd around anymore? I think it's > probably better to point people away from ncvs/dcvs-style setups. >=20 > It may also be worth replacing the cvs-freebsd article with something > that talks about subversion, or even some of the git repositories > mentioned in https://wiki.freebsd.org/GitWorkflow - but this can be done > separately. >=20 > So what do you think, is it ok to 'svn rm' the cvs-freebsd/ article and > then look into replacing it with something more modern? >=20 My personal preference is to ensure we have a matching svn replacement before removing the cvs-freebsd/ bits, so we do not leave people straggling with converting from one source control system to another, or worse, newcomers that cannot find any documentation on the current source control system. Glen --4f28nU6agdXSinmL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJRFJPjAAoJEFJPDDeguUaj4/4H/07c/Gwq3OGCBchhsAnumMUz h1ma+KPKtyO2S7higIYgs4iLL40QcKwcliSoDbVe3kTp1cJsYm9iM1bTkjvBfkf7 CGgkBFlPIwWuNoJJKdUlUJbDVToZtztu1IJ6xVtSIsfcyOpwCJsYnWRJzWRrJQyM 3MJoEnH96ZSf+Rc9E2V6IWnBHiUHef/evl6uAQUC/VRRt7XTU+5gypmbZTxCdzel UiYRAnPUIGCWlQTRkyQGOzVcrEqPphtkV1zsKi4yu5Geoffdvx6g0ISLXkbUFiyQ JjRuGOb+mQDZzI7u+NNvNn8y4If3ZJPWtoKpooXUNz6eV8ZrHAGFOEe1hv9GBGI= =lbZ1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4f28nU6agdXSinmL--