From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 27 07:33:55 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A5C16A4B3; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 07:33:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE0C43FE1; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 07:33:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9RFXoE7004103; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 08:33:50 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 08:33:17 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20031027.083317.54187409.imp@bsdimp.com> To: danfe@nsu.ru From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20031027121613.GB17552@regency.nsu.ru> References: <20031027093150.GA58637@regency.nsu.ru> <20031027030448.A67575@FreeBSD.org> <20031027121613.GB17552@regency.nsu.ru> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: fjoe@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: bmah@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/doc/share/sgml release.ent X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:33:55 -0000 In message: <20031027121613.GB17552@regency.nsu.ru> Alexey Dokuchaev writes: : On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 03:04:48AM -0800, Max Khon wrote: : > Hello! : > : > On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 03:31:50PM +0600, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: : > : > > > bmah 2003/10/26 21:37:00 PST : > > > : > > > FreeBSD src repository : > > > : > > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4_9) : > > > release/doc/share/sgml release.ent : > > > Log: : > > > The next release of FreeBSD will most likely be 4.9.1, according to : > > > current RE plans. : > > : > > I'd like to see 4.10 someday though. 4.x set a de-facto standard WRT : > > security, robustness, and overall excellent general- (and all-) purpose : > > operating system. Seems like it deserves 10th incarnation. 8-) : > : > there will be problems if it will be called 4.10. : > at least with __FreeBSD_version. : : Hmm, I seem to recall a conversation from where I've got an impression : that in FreeBSD X.Y, Y can go from 0 through 9, 10, ..., 99 up to 100. : I'll take a look closed at __FreeBSD_version, thanks. in 5.x that's true, but in 4.x, only 0-9 were considered for Y. The __FreeBSD_version will decode as 4.9.1, even if we call it 4.10. Warner