Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 14:14:13 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 204883] lang/go: fix build on armv6hf Message-ID: <bug-204883-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204883 Bug ID: 204883 Summary: lang/go: fix build on armv6hf Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: arm OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: jlaffaye@FreeBSD.org Reporter: mmoll@freebsd.org CC: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(jlaffaye@FreeBSD.org) Assignee: jlaffaye@FreeBSD.org CC: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Created attachment 163630 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=163630&action=edit port Makefile patch When building lang/go with a patch similar to the one in #204882 on real ARM h/w I got: "runtime: this system has multiple CPUs and must use atomic synchronization instructions. Recompile using GOARM=7." For the background, please see https://github.com/golang/go/issues/12067 This is leading to an ugly situation, because (for FreeBSD) AMRv6 also includes ARMv7, while there are really some differences. I did set GOARM=7 in the Makefile and everything is fine for me, but this will lead to binaries not working on ARMv6 CPUs (i.e. the original RPi, while RPi 2 has ARMv7). I also didn't test this on non-hf armv6. Some ARM experts should weigh in here. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-204883-13>