From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 6 18:43:31 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A0A7CB5 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 18:43:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CC00B0F for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 18:43:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id ma3so2970350pbc.41 for ; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 10:43:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=/atlecJu1v6Ns3crcrzzFM1CnLQe4AGY5rPAHE00Hac=; b=dHNiirLzcS6KQJDTLlCgskdiAYBJ80tL3Dc5OZC7eA1EFJ4gYcBvDc6sEWfLsymkYn ihoaTjP3Iix3Y3c6KHv0r7vsbyce7bNaCFmx/YZbQxIQZN27LOepKeAb7IEaggWSsdCC T4/hwQhhJ9yHn4h4xS/TmKm66jXsIOanxIBfaL9NjZm4teXLBkE1eRUoMrObrmA8f5U5 I6Ol/W8CDcpYIQX3q6DU7blAIYZQ8tCPNCzliLXN4Lp7eLXbMbXDxhivC7lz/VPU9KKv Hm929x01dzv9r95i0ktqxBnEXKGAK9BR3FmRlncuN6zg8Aq6O2s+cyyXli5hj1IwRLAI LL8A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkGxQRut3fqgCmF1Q9v/w/0sRZFoiU2iuugB/SAya4lv5NWQFUkJWUZQ7U/gW/RsqjfrMq8 X-Received: by 10.68.228.138 with SMTP id si10mr16430547pbc.13.1394131410458; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 10:43:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from lglt-nvaradarajan.corp.netflix.com (dc1-prod.netflix.com. [69.53.236.251]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id op3sm22382799pbc.40.2014.03.06.10.43.29 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 06 Mar 2014 10:43:29 -0800 (PST) Sender: Warner Losh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\)) Subject: Re: bsdtar POLA change in 10.0? From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <1394110822.21224.91297125.0B659AFB@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 11:43:28 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <56BC2D25-7163-43A2-AB04-9A808AA98F85@gmail.com> References: <53171DAE.5070203@li.ru> <1394110822.21224.91297125.0B659AFB@webmail.messagingengine.com> To: Mark Felder X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 18:43:31 -0000 On Mar 6, 2014, at 6:00 AM, Mark Felder wrote: >=20 >=20 > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014, at 6:50, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote: >> I wonder why >>=20 >> bsdtar --one-file-system >>=20 >> suddenly started to skip archiving of mount-points? And no mention of=20= >> such behaviour change either in UPDATING or errata :( >>=20 >=20 > --one-file-system > (c, r, and u modes) Do not cross mount points. >=20 > Isn't that what it's supposed to do? Skip any mounted filesystems? Was > it broken before? Or do I simply not understand the behavior you're > seeing. Before it would archive the directory where the other filesystem was = mounted, but nothing else. Now it doesn=92t archive that directory. I believe this is a bug, since that directory (but nothing in it or = under it) still belongs to this filesystem... Warner