From owner-freebsd-bugs  Wed Feb  5 08:50:07 1997
Return-Path: <owner-bugs>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA02041
          for bugs-outgoing; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 08:50:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA01972;
          Wed, 5 Feb 1997 08:50:03 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 08:50:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199702051650.IAA01972@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs
Cc: 
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
Subject: Re: bin/2657: ypserv thinks there is no computers in network 10.1.2.3 netmask 255.255.255.0
Reply-To: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

The following reply was made to PR bin/2657; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
To: freebsd-gnats@freebsd.org, tejblum@arc.hq.cti.ru
Cc:  Subject: Re: bin/2657: ypserv thinks there is no computers in network 10.1.2.3 netmask 255.255.255.0
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 1997 21:21:59 PST

 ypserv is right.  Network numbers are normally specified with a "0" in the
 host portion; in your case, the network number is 10.1.2.0 .  10.1.2.3 is
 a host address on the network 10.1.2.0 .  Your patch simply allows people
 to specify either a host address or the network number in the securenets
 file.
 
   Bill