From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Apr 3 13:18:43 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.utexas.edu (wb2-a.mail.utexas.edu [128.83.126.136]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DDB1B14F5A for ; Sat, 3 Apr 1999 13:18:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kevin.weiss@mail.utexas.edu) Received: (qmail 24410 invoked by uid 0); 3 Apr 1999 21:16:44 -0000 Received: from ens317-33.ece.utexas.edu (HELO ens317-33) (146.6.101.83) by umbs-smtp-2 with SMTP; 3 Apr 1999 21:16:44 -0000 X-Sender: kevin.weiss@mail.utexas.edu X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0.2 Date: Sat, 03 Apr 1999 15:16:06 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Kevin Weiss Subject: afterstep vs. windowmaker...which one is better? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <19990403211841.DDB1B14F5A@hub.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG If anyone has an opinion on which one s better, could you please e-mail me, and tell me your reason(s) why? Thanks To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message