From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Jun 3 17:51:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rpi.edu (mail.rpi.edu [128.113.22.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B4B637B400 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 17:51:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by mail.rpi.edu (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g540penK080114; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 20:51:40 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <3CFC00A9.BD98B7BD@mindspring.com> References: <20020602010108.B16166@espresso.q9media.com> <20020603011903.Y2566-100000@gamplex.bde.org> <20020603162508.A34224@xor.obsecurity.org> <3CFC00A9.BD98B7BD@mindspring.com> Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 20:51:39 -0400 To: Terry Lambert , Kris Kennaway From: Garance A Drosihn Subject: Re: Removing wait union Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.3 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang) Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 4:50 PM -0700 6/3/02, Terry Lambert wrote: >All the builds could be done in parallel in their own >subdirectories (not installed), so the process could be >much faster than using the cluster the way the cluser is >supposed to be used. This implies the building of a second cluster, one that is setup for doing these parallel builds. That sounds like it would be more trouble (to setup, and to keep setup) than it's worth. Might as well just use the tools we already have. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message