From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Mar 1 16:45:43 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mail.demos.su (relay1.demos.su [194.87.0.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6E037B402; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 16:45:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from [194.87.2.36] (HELO cavia.pp.ru) by mail.demos.su (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.6/D) with ESMTP-TLS id 16574461; Sat, 02 Mar 2002 03:45:37 +0300 Received: (from mitya@localhost) by cavia.pp.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g220iii17584; Sat, 2 Mar 2002 03:44:44 +0300 (MSK) Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 03:44:44 +0300 From: =?koi8-r?B?5M3J1NLJyiDzydfB3sXOy88=?= To: Ying-Chieh Liao Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, demon@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: how about merge x11-wm/afterstep and x11-wm/afterstep-stable ? Message-ID: <20020302004444.GA17567@cavia.pp.ru> References: <20020301062029.GA79330@terry.dragon2.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020301062029.GA79330@terry.dragon2.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 02:20:29PM +0800, Ying-Chieh Liao wrote: > I dont know why we have both afterstep & afterstep-stable > can we merge them into one port or repo-copy afterstep-stable to afterstep ? > > btw, the latest afterstep is 1.8.10 (on official site) > -- > Allocate four digits for the year part of a date : a new millennium is coming. > --- David Huber I already proposed this some time ago. Several people (e.g. steve, if my memory doesn't fail me) insisted to keep afterstep port at version 1... I am all for it. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message