From owner-cvs-all Sat Dec 18 15: 6:38 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from green.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15D4414D22; Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:06:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from green@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (green@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by green.dyndns.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA00599; Sat, 18 Dec 1999 18:05:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from green@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 18:05:54 -0500 (EST) From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman X-Sender: green@green.dyndns.org To: Warner Losh Cc: Bruce Evans , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/gen fts.c In-Reply-To: <199912182151.OAA91959@harmony.village.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Sat, 18 Dec 1999, Warner Losh wrote: > In message Brian Fundakowski Feldman writes: > : I concluded otherwise. Which has more weight: the evidence toward > : immunity, or the evidence toward vulnerability? I can assure you > : that this problem was still there under 3.X a few months ago, with > : RELENG_3 and HEAD fts.c, but only fixed in OpenBSD's fts.c. And > : nothing's changed since then before now; both HEAD and RELENG_3 > : both had big problems with fts(3). > > Ah, I thought I had committed Bruce's fixes, but it turns out that > they are just in my tree.... That's not good. I had been sitting around, waiting for someone else to do something. I waited to almost release time... and upon noone else having fixed it, I did what I could. You know, you can still revert to version 1.11 of that file, add your changes, and commit to version 1.13. As for RELENG_3_4_0_RELEASE, it does currently have a good fts.c, even if it's not that one. > > : > One reason I didn't do something similar was that there were binary > : > compat issues that I didn't want to introduce... > : > : Huh? The API didn't change, at all. > > There was at least one API change in OpenBSD tree that resulted in > their bumping libc's version. This change was specifically omitted in > previous merges. Right. Did you read my import commit message? I specifically noted this and why I chose version 1.22 and not 1.23. > > Warner > -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! / green@FreeBSD.org `------------------------------' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message