From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 28 01:09:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6939E16A4CE; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 01:09:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2665F43D31; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 01:09:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 213DD149C4; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 19:09:36 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 19:09:35 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Vsevolod Stakhov In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/79289: New port: security/qca X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 01:09:37 -0000 If this is a library, shouldn't it be in 'devel' instead?