From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 22 21:46:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF22106566B; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:46:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EADB8FC17; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:46:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CAEE6D41B; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:46:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0A8DE8448F; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 23:46:48 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Nick Hibma References: <20090921112657.GW95398@hoeg.nl> <4AB7ED76.5010406@FreeBSD.org> <20090922082344.GA64877@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <37B47737-E4A4-4CF3-9DAA-B0F0A4CC8901@van-laarhoven.org> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 23:46:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <37B47737-E4A4-4CF3-9DAA-B0F0A4CC8901@van-laarhoven.org> (Nick Hibma's message of "Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:06:42 +0200") Message-ID: <86d45i1wl3.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.95 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: arch@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tmux(1) in base X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:46:49 -0000 Nick Hibma writes: > Our package system is a tremendous asset, and wholeheartedly agree > with Doug on this. So my vote is now a -1. Not that anyone cares. Having seen how it turned out, I'd like to vote -50,000,000 on this whole discussion... DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no