From owner-freebsd-doc Thu Jul 1 2:45:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from www0w.netaddress.usa.net (www0w.netaddress.usa.net [204.68.24.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F1E714F33 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 02:45:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jesus.monroy@usa.net) Received: (qmail 16439 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Jul 1999 09:45:20 -0000 Message-ID: <19990701094520.16438.qmail@www0w.netaddress.usa.net> Received: from 204.68.24.52 by www0w via web-mailer() on Thu Jul 1 09:45:20 GMT 1999 Date: 1 Jul 99 02:45:20 PDT From: Jesus Monroy To: Nik Clayton Subject: Re: [Re: what is the policy for builtin shell functions?] Cc: doc@freebsd.org X-Mailer: USANET web-mailer () Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Nik Clayton wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 1999 at 12:48:02PM -0700, Jesus Monroy wrote: > > I've note many builtin functions for csh(1) and sh(1) = > > have no apropos(1) or whatis(1). = > > = > > Especially annoying are 'limit' and 'unlimit'. = > = > Couldn't agree more. Please file a PR about this. One that includes = > patches would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. > = Can't patch, don't know how. = Don't want to CVS (at all). Can PR. What do you want include? Where do I PR? How is it done? --- "I'd rather pay for my freedom than live in a bitmapped, = pop-up-happy dungeon like NT." http://www.performancecomputing.com/features/9809of1.shtml ____________________________________________________________________ Get free e-mail and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=3D= 1 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message