Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 8 Mar 2004 12:11:54 +1100
From:      Edwin Groothuis <edwin@freebsd.org>
To:        ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   PORTREVISION bump, how deep should I go?
Message-ID:  <20040308011154.GA35894@k7.mavetju>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello,

With regarding to ports/57475, it does do a version bump of libsdl.so.
With regarding to the ports depending on this one, what should I do?

- PORTVERSION change for devel/sdl12, that's enough
- PORTREVISION bump for all ports directly depending on devel/sdl12
  (with grepping for USE_SDL)
- PORTREVISION bump for all ports depending on devel/sdl12 (based
  on grepping INDEX for sdl12)
- PORTREVISION bump for all ports depending on devel/sdl12, even
  if they are hidden behind a HAVE_SDL
- PORTREVISION bump for all ports in the tree

Personally, for me the first option is enough (and portupgrade
should do the trick anyway), I wouldn't find figuring out for option
two, but then I know that option three and/or option four is more
reasonable then. Options five is useless there but just to complete,
I don't think too many people who are in the right state of mind
would suggest that one anyway.

Edwin

-- 
Edwin Groothuis      |            Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
edwin@freebsd.org    |          Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040308011154.GA35894>