From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Feb 16 02:28:11 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA16549 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 02:28:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from random.tpgi.com.au (random.tpgi.com.au [203.12.160.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA16526 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 02:28:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eirvine@tpgi.com.au) Received: (from smtpd@localhost) by random.tpgi.com.au (8.8.4/8.8.6) id VAA05577 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 21:19:59 +1100 (EST) Message-Id: <199802161019.VAA05577@random.tpgi.com.au> Received: from tar-ppp-166.tpgi.com.au(203.26.26.166), claiming to be "gretchen" via SMTP by random.tpgi.com.au, id smtpdAAAa001Mj; Mon Feb 16 21:19:50 1998 From: "Edward Irvine" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 21:22:28 +0000 Subject: Bug in telnet 2.2.5 ?? In-reply-to: <199802160902.MAA01505@amsoft.ru> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have a number of users getting terminal access to a FBSD 2.2-Stable box using telnet on a lan. A novice user quit her telnet session without using the "exit" command. That is, she was using ee, got stuck, and went to File --> Quit, and then shutdown her Mac. A little later I ran top on the console. Her "ee" session was still there, using 97% of the CPU time. Is this a bug I should report?? Cheers Eddie eirvine@tpgi.com.au To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message