From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jun 12 17:29:27 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2F0FA16A4CE; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 17:29:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from smtp2.server.rpi.edu (smtp2.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.2])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C084643D39; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 17:29:26 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu)
Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47])
	by smtp2.server.rpi.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5CHSoVu016113;
	Sat, 12 Jun 2004 13:28:50 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu
Message-Id: <p06020461bcf0ecfb2eda@[128.113.24.47]>
In-Reply-To: <200406121844.55218.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
References: <20040612131142.GB43669@xor.obsecurity.org>
 <200406121844.55218.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 13:28:49 -0400
To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>,
	freebsd-current@freebsd.org
From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca)
cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bg fsck and fs corruption
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 17:29:27 -0000

At 6:44 PM +0200 6/12/04, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
>On Saturday 12 June 2004 15:11, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>  > phk's sparc panicked while I was using it for package building,
>  > and since he had forgotten to disable bg fsck I was reminded
>  > again of why I turn it off on all my other systems:
>
>Why does it default to on anyway? :-(

I think it is reasonable to have it default on for a *current* branch,
but if there are still issues with it at the time of 5.3-release then
we should change the default to be off for the 5.x-stable branch...

Are these issues on the list of things which "Must Be Fixed" for
5.x-stable?

-- 
Garance Alistair Drosehn            =   gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer           or  gad@freebsd.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute    or  drosih@rpi.edu