Date: 08 Apr 2001 23:54:21 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com> Cc: Joseph Mallett <jmallett@newgold.net>, David Kelly <dkelly@grumpy.dyndns.org>, Bzdik BSD <bzdik@yahoo.com>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Clash of Titans - Tale of two Morons Message-ID: <xzpitkfqcqa.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <200104082022.QAA22402@sheffield.cnchost.com> References: <200104082022.QAA22402@sheffield.cnchost.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com> writes: > [...] Perhaps -current has become so fragile > partially because of the kernel size and interdependency of > modules. Such rearchitecting would be fun but a big task.... CURRENT isn't particularly fragile right now - and you obviously haven't been paying attention; the bad spots CURRENT went through earlier this year were precisely *because of* major rearchitecturing. There are currently almost 700,000 lines (22 MB) of unified diffs between the -STABLE and -CURRENT kernel sources. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpitkfqcqa.fsf>