Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      08 Apr 2001 23:54:21 +0200
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
To:        Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>
Cc:        Joseph Mallett <jmallett@newgold.net>, David Kelly <dkelly@grumpy.dyndns.org>, Bzdik BSD <bzdik@yahoo.com>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Clash of Titans - Tale of two Morons
Message-ID:  <xzpitkfqcqa.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <200104082022.QAA22402@sheffield.cnchost.com>
References:  <200104082022.QAA22402@sheffield.cnchost.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com> writes:
>                [...]  Perhaps -current has become so fragile
> partially because of the kernel size and interdependency of
> modules.  Such rearchitecting would be fun but a big task....

CURRENT isn't particularly fragile right now - and you obviously
haven't been paying attention; the bad spots CURRENT went through
earlier this year were precisely *because of* major rearchitecturing.
There are currently almost 700,000 lines (22 MB) of unified diffs
between the -STABLE and -CURRENT kernel sources.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpitkfqcqa.fsf>