From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Feb 21 15:28:20 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from stardust.bzzzz.com (stardust.bzzzz.com [209.90.68.199]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B2C10EF7 for ; Sun, 21 Feb 1999 15:28:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from clubkid@bzzzz.com) Received: from localhost (clubkid@localhost) by stardust.bzzzz.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA00348 for ; Sun, 21 Feb 1999 16:28:17 -0700 (MST) Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 16:28:17 -0700 (MST) From: Brian Budnick To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: network problem Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have a Pentium-90Mhz machine running with 80megs of Ram. Over the past couple of days I have been messing around with the machine trying to get it to do 'natd' with a 10base-t card and a 100base-t card and have had nothing but problems. I have tried several different 10/100 base t cards and every card i have tried gives same problem. I decided to just stick in 2 (10baseT) ethernet cards and I have been transfering things over the last 30 minutes and it hasn't locked up at all. So i think it works just fine the way that it is now, but I can't figure out why it won't work with the 10base-t card and the 10/100 base-t card together. It's really frustrating. I have been on the #freebsd channel on both efnet and undernet and they weren't much help on this subject. I just bought a 100base-t only hub and now i think i just lost an investment because i can't seem to get FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE to work. I have been thinking about going back to like version 2.2.8 and see how it reacts to this type of thing. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Brian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message