From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb 25 16:01:38 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 541F216A4CE; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 16:01:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8AD8143D1D; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 16:01:37 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2])
	by gw.catspoiler.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i1Q01Q7E078740;
	Wed, 25 Feb 2004 16:01:30 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org)
Message-Id: <200402260001.i1Q01Q7E078740@gw.catspoiler.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 16:01:26 -0800 (PST)
From: Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org>
To: jhb@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <200402242136.i1OLadK8068463@repoman.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man9 sx.9
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 00:01:38 -0000

On 24 Feb, John Baldwin wrote:
> jhb         2004/02/24 13:36:39 PST
> 
>   FreeBSD src repository
> 
>   Modified files:
>     share/man/man9       sx.9 
>   Log:
>   - Clarify ambiguous statement about not being able to both slock and xlock
>     a single lock at the same time.
>   - Avoid using "own" to refer to holding either a shared or exclusive lock
>     as it is only really correct for exclusive locks.
>   - Reword the sentence about sleep-ability to read easier.
>   
>   Requested by:   truckman (1)

Thanks!