From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 23 01:05:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5F416A4CE; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 01:05:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AAA143D5A; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 01:05:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9N15m48021317; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:05:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i9N15mnu021316; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:05:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:05:47 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20041023010547.GC20513@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <4175B591.4090407@elischer.org> <200410201553.40823.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20041021180809.GA36479@dragon.nuxi.com> <200410211557.23246.jhb@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200410211557.23246.jhb@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/i386/net htonl.S ntohl.S X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 01:05:49 -0000 On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 03:57:23PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > I waded though many arch@ archives but couldn't find where I had > brought this issue up. I did find one instance where it was discussed > prior to the SMPng commit back in April/May 2000 (old, yes) where cp@ > wanted to drop 386 and 486 support for 5, and the ideas there were to > allow for separate kernels. At this point, I guess I don't care/have > enough time to burn on this. I would think you of all people would > care about sticking to previously agreed to decisions though. I'm trying to. The problem is we don't seem to have a consensis on what the "previously agreed to decision" was. And we didn't formally document it. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)