From owner-freebsd-current Wed May 26 23:11:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mta1-rme.xtra.co.nz (mta.xtra.co.nz [203.96.92.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EED314F2C for ; Wed, 26 May 1999 23:11:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from junkmale@pop3.xtra.co.nz) Received: from wocker ([210.55.152.128]) by mta1-rme.xtra.co.nz (InterMail v04.00.02.07 201-227-108) with SMTP id <19990527055617.VFKU7869945.mta1-rme@wocker> for ; Thu, 27 May 1999 17:56:17 +1200 From: "Dan Langille" Organization: The FreeBSD Diary To: current@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 17:53:48 +1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: FTP passive mode - a new default? Reply-To: junkmale@xtra.co.nz References: <199905261541.JAA21476@mt.sri.com> In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01d) Message-Id: <19990527055617.VFKU7869945.mta1-rme@wocker> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 26 May 99, at 23:50, Adam wrote: > > > Unless I hear unanimous fierce outcry against it, I'm strongly > > > considering making FTP_PASSIVE_MODE obsolete by virtue of being the > > > default for all tools/libraries which currently examine it. > > If they already examine FTP_PASSIVE_MODE, why not just set it to YES by > default somewhere? That makes more sense to me than introducing a new flag. -- Dan Langille - DVL Software Limited The FreeBSD Diary - http://www.FreeBSDDiary.org/freebsd/ NZ FreeBSD User Group - http://www.nzfug.nz.freebsd.org/ The Racing System - http://www.racingsystem.com/racingsystem.htm To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message