From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Dec 28 23:43:13 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id XAA18192 for ports-outgoing; Sat, 28 Dec 1996 23:43:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from veda.is (root@veda.is [193.4.230.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id XAA18187 for ; Sat, 28 Dec 1996 23:43:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from veda.is (adam@ubiq.veda.is [193.4.230.60]) by veda.is (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id HAA20316; Sun, 29 Dec 1996 07:45:50 GMT Message-Id: <199612290745.HAA20316@veda.is> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: mailer "=" crud In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 25 Dec 1996 22:47:42 PST." <199612260647.WAA05315@baloon.mimi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 29 Dec 1996 07:50:13 +0000 From: Adam David Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > * > * freefall still has bsd.port.mk from 4.Dec, while thud has it from 17= > * =2EDec. > > Please fix your mailing program, this "=" business is ugly and hard to > read! ;) This seems also to be a generic problem with exmh (mh?) when it detects a character with the top bit set. I am certain that it is not just my copy of the program. I do know that I did not ask for quoted-printable when I sent actual iso-8859-1 data to myself, and I did not get quoted-printable when I sent myself again the message that precipitated the original complaint. Adam