From owner-freebsd-net Wed Aug 26 07:39:26 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA09462 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 26 Aug 1998 07:39:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA09457 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 1998 07:39:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id KAA05325; Wed, 26 Aug 1998 10:38:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 10:38:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <199808261438.KAA05325@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Marc Giannoni Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: NETCCITT sources In-Reply-To: References: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org < said: Sending the same message to four disparate lists is not a way to Win Friends and Influence People. > A 'core' team member expressed the opinion that there was just not > enough interest to justify reviving these. No, that's not really our reason for killing the X.25 support. We simply don't have any major kernel developers who are able to support this particular dusty deck. As we further evolve the networking code, dealing with an ancient, obsolete protocol stack would be a significant hindrance. We're perfectly willing, however, to ``bless'' any third party who wanted to try to make this stuff work. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message