From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 24 07:27:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D878ADC3 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 07:27:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davide.damico@contactlab.com) Received: from mail2.shared.smtp.contactlab.it (mail2.shared.smtp.contactlab.it [93.94.37.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6843CD18 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 07:27:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=contactlab.it; s=clab1; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; i=@contactlab.it; t=1364110023; h=From:Subject:Date:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=Mr7W6zWBfex9coGurKISq9PI8UkZb+VnZwPlwkIYz7M=; b=c1iSVlhKAsDLegjZK/xZrd0DOdR+tQApM4MdGSS6QIEA4Vp4TDfto3a3Qw3d+4Xe pm0K3WyIUPCsjlDZ7OjIUcz3OGtC3xHq7lImJi5+9viwu+wRYqOohptN150917lG reihx9/5WMUmPlD8axcZ+3kx622fSIa8vdngFgVJVmY=; Received: from [213.92.90.12] ([213.92.90.12:17775] helo=mail3.tomato.it) by t.contactlab.it (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.1.37854 r(Momo-dev:3.5.1.0)) with ESMTP id BF/0D-24145-7CAAE415; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 08:27:03 +0100 Received: from mx3-master.housing.tomato.lan ([172.16.7.55]) by mail3.tomato.it with smtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1UJfKZ-0009AO-3M for freebsd-performance@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 08:27:03 +0100 Received: (qmail 35235 invoked by uid 80); 24 Mar 2013 07:27:03 -0000 To: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3 X-PHP-Script: uebmeil.sys.tomatointeractive.it/index.php for 172.16.16.50 X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:main.inc MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 08:27:03 +0100 From: Davide D'Amico Organization: ContactLab Mail-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: References: <514C1E5F.8040504@contactlab.com> <142597a8659b43db8665aa1f055d2ff1@sys.tomatointeractive.it> Message-ID: <0ef1c644c38ac78cfc74288b1ca736f6@sys.tomatointeractive.it> X-Sender: davide.damico@contactlab.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.5 Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: davide.damico@contactlab.com List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 07:27:05 -0000 Il 24.03.2013 07:10 Mehmet Erol Sanliturk ha scritto: > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Davide D'Amico > wrote: > >> Il 22.03.2013 16:56 Евгений Хоркин ha scritto: >> >>> Hi Davide! >> >> Sorry if I do a reply 'here' but some posts where filtered by >> antispam. >> >> To Daniel Bilik: yes, I used the 'complex' OLTP tests, because more >> similar to my production dataset/workload. >> >> I'll try the 'simple' dataset, but do you think I have some chance to >> "solve" the issue? >> >> Thanks, >> d. > > Since you are testing CentOS , is there a difference between Fedora > and CentOS ? > If you tried this alternative or your idea about difference if you > did not try it . > Well, I tried only CentOS because I have some server in farm with CentOS, so I don't think I'll test Fedora (I tend to minimize the number of OS in my farm). d.