From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 10 10:32:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F0C16A41F; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 10:32:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6EB43D45; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 10:32:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j8AAWcD8096603 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 10 Sep 2005 14:32:38 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j8AAWblj096602; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 14:32:37 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 14:32:37 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Colin Percival Message-ID: <20050910103237.GD53891@cell.sick.ru> References: <200509091936.j89JaUkA061400@repoman.freebsd.org> <4321E5DC.6020704@freebsd.org> <20050909195940.GA32217@dragon.NUXI.org> <4322B308.90703@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4322B308.90703@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, obrien@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT exclude X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 10:32:41 -0000 On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 03:18:48AM -0700, Colin Percival wrote: C> > On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 12:43:24PM -0700, Colin Percival wrote: C> >>Speaking of which, would it be possible for someone who knows the right C> >>magical incantations to disable this check entirely for security branches? C> >>It's much easier for us if we don't add $FreeBSD$ tags, but repeatedly C> >>toggling the exclude file seems rather silly. C> > C> > This seems against the spirit of a security branch. One reason we have C> > the $FreeBSD$ tags so one can tell what source built a particular binary. C> C> I see your point, but the number of people who would rely upon being able C> to search for $FreeBSD$ tags is small -- and that approach won't work at C> all for people who downloaded the patches from ftp.freebsd.org instead of C> using CVSup. I don't agree that number of people who would use $FreeBSD$ tags is small. Concerning patched on FTP: why we don't supply patches that change RCS Id? -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE