From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Wed Dec 9 14:40:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EDB99D5606; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 14:40:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 349511848; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 14:40:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 337911BCC; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 14:40:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 14:40:13 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Cy Schubert Cc: Cy Schubert , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r403347 - head/security/keepassx2 Message-ID: <20151209144013.GA10737@FreeBSD.org> References: <20151209081342.GA41332@FreeBSD.org> <201512091415.tB9EFNEn008676@slippy.cwsent.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201512091415.tB9EFNEn008676@slippy.cwsent.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 14:40:13 -0000 On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 06:15:23AM -0800, Cy Schubert wrote: > In message <20151209081342.GA41332@FreeBSD.org>, Alexey Dokuchaev writes: > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 08:40:41PM +0000, Cy Schubert wrote: > > > New Revision: 403347 > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/403347 > > > > > > Log: > > > Update 2.0-beta2 --> 2.0 > > > [...] > > > > > > PORTNAME= keepassx > > > -DISTVERSION= 2.0-beta2 > > > -PORTEPOCH= 1 > > > +DISTVERSION= 2.0 > > > +PORTEPOCH= 2 > > > > Why did you bump port epoch here? DISTVERSION ensures that resulting > > PORTVERSION is correctly mangled, and used for -betas and -rcs because > > it allows to seamless update to .0 releases: > > > > $ make -V PORTVERSION DISTVERSION=2.0-beta2 > > 2.0.b2 > > $ pkg version -t 2.0.b2 2.0 > > < > > My mistake. I expected 2.0.b2 to sort after 2.0. Understood; please please please guys, always check before bumping the epoch as it can never go back (unless you rename the package). ./danfe (portepoch hater)