From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 8 19:29:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A254C16A4CE for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 19:29:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from meitner.wh.uni-dortmund.de (meitner.wh.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.129.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F72143D49 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 19:29:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net) Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (pc2-105.intern.meitner [10.3.12.105]) by meitner.wh.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB69167522; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 21:29:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.8.4] (lofi@kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i58JT2dH081442 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Jun 2004 21:29:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net) From: Michael Nottebrock To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, Andrew J Caines Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 21:28:58 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <1086686577.779.36.camel@leguin> <20040608181011.GA18836@hal9000.halplant.com> In-Reply-To: <20040608181011.GA18836@hal9000.halplant.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_+NhxAZby1lei9RP"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406082129.02406.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: Re: XFree86-4 balls up X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 19:29:06 -0000 --Boundary-02=_+NhxAZby1lei9RP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 08 June 2004 20:10, Andrew J Caines wrote: > Matthy, > > > Everything is now compiling nicely. How could a few simply > > switches make the difference between something compiling and something > > going tits up? By triggering compiler bugs. So yes, it is a bug, but it's in gcc - and=20 chances that gcc 2.95.4 will receive much further maintenance are very slim= =20 indeed. > Because "optimisation" means taking something which works and turning it > into something which doesn't. > > Try building stuff with a non-gcc compiler _and_ optimisation. It's not unheard of that this can work. :) =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --Boundary-02=_+NhxAZby1lei9RP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAxhN+Xhc68WspdLARAkBiAJ4j6AVC1t05w7rgN3zktHBjw9c5LQCdGVLL LnNMn+7PGc+xKx1s7AYhmrE= =9mJ1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_+NhxAZby1lei9RP--