From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jun 12 9:20: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C076837B8B2 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 09:20:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id JAA74324; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 09:20:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 09:20:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200006121620.JAA74324@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Trevor Johnson Subject: Re: ports/19216: new port: japanese/funetfonts Reply-To: Trevor Johnson Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/19216; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Trevor Johnson To: KATO Tsuguru Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/19216: new port: japanese/funetfonts Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 12:10:00 -0400 (EDT) > It seems that several portion of this PR, such as kanji18 and kanji26, > are already exist in FreeBSD ports. You're right about those two. I don't see any other identical files though. Which ones did you have in mind? > And then, I guess X11 font file ports should be as an individual port > per typeface and size. I don't see such a recommendation in the Handbook, and looking in the x11-fonts category I see only one of the font collections that follows that practice. Xg, etlfonts, freefonts, intlfonts, mozilla-fonts and sharefonts don't. IMO the fonts in this collection have as much in common with each other as do the ones in those collections. While looking in the Handbook, I see that I forgot to use the "local" directory as per section 4.4.11, so I'l fix that. Thank you for examining my PR. -- Trevor Johnson http://jpj.net/~trevor/gpgkey.txt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message