From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sat Aug 24 15:58:30 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981DEC3487 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 15:58:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46G2xL3VDVz3MqJ for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 15:58:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 77D8BC3486; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 15:58:30 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 779E7C3485 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 15:58:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46G2xL2bHJz3MqG for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 15:58:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B49C776E for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 15:58:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x7OFwUEM079186 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 15:58:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x7OFwUep079185 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 15:58:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238780] converters/pdf2djvu: fix build with GCC-based architectures Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 15:58:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: samy.mahmoudi@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 15:58:30 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238780 --- Comment #17 from Samy Mahmoudi --- (In reply to Samy Mahmoudi from comment #11) > .if ${ARCH:Mmips*} || ${ARCH:Mpowerpc*} || ${ARCH} =3D=3D sparc64 > Is your GCC-architecture included in the previous conditionals ? Based on comment 16, I assume it is. (In reply to Piotr Kubaj from comment #16) > In fact, powerpc* on head soon switches to clang. Thanks for this information, I did not know that would happen soon, but...= =20 (In reply to Piotr Kubaj from comment #16) > This assumes that powerpc* uses GCC which won't hold true forever. ...the conditional expression was not meant to be immutable, e.g. to add new GCC-architectures when needed, or to remove the ones clang become functional on. Software sometimes needs to be maintained, even with the best software methodologies and practices. > Why not set USES=3Dcompiler:c++11-lang? This was the default under which you had to file a bug report, so this would only bring us back to Description (comment 0) and subsequent comments. Do y= ou mean USES=3Dcompiler:c++11-lib ? I am reading Mk/Uses/compiler.mk and will = give it a try. If this automatically chooses between clang and gcc depending on architecture, it would avoid us to have to maintain the conditional. This w= ould definitely be a better practice ! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=