Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:01:44 -0500
From:      David Schultz <das@freebsd.org>
To:        Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r230368 - head/tools/regression/usr.bin/cc
Message-ID:  <20120120150144.GB306@zim.MIT.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <4F19748F.3010906@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201201200657.q0K6vMhf028463@svn.freebsd.org> <20120120075551.GA28975@freebsd.org> <4F19748F.3010906@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-01-20 08:55, Roman Divacky wrote:
> >http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=11406 says this has been
> >fixed, is this just problem with us having older clang in base?
> 
> Obviously, it has only been fixed in llvm trunk.  If this is a pressing
> problem, we can backport the fix.  Otherwise, it will be fixed when we
> import a more recent snapshot.

It isn't a pressing issue.  The test was failing due to an even
more basic bug than the one I was trying to test; adding two
constants was producing the wrong answer.  Therefore, I can't
confirm that the test now passes, but they did fix *a* bug.

By the way, having dealt with gcc bugs in the past, I found
reporting a clang bug to be an unexpectedly pleasant experience.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120120150144.GB306>