From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Jan 12 10:28:33 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA08268 for chat-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jan 1998 10:28:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from smtp.interlog.com (root@smtp.interlog.com [198.53.145.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA08186 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 1998 10:28:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from paulg@interlog.com) Received: from shell1.interlog.com (paulg@shell1.interlog.com [207.34.202.8]) by smtp.interlog.com (8.8.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA26934; Mon, 12 Jan 1998 13:27:45 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 13:27:44 -0500 (EST) From: Paul Griffith To: Dag-Erling Coidan Smørgrav cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD splash in a wired article. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from QUOTED-PRINTABLE to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id KAA08204 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Can some tell us young folks what the teardrop exploit is ???? Paul Griffith - paulg@interlog.com On 12 Jan 1998, Dag-Erling Coidan Smørgrav wrote: > Open Systems Networking writes: > > http://www.wired.com/news/news/technology/story/9581.html > > "DeVoe said that openly-developed operating systems, such as FreeBSD > and Linux, had patches available for the teardrop exploit very early > on." > > AFAIR BSD-based OSes, unlike Windows and Linux, never *were* > vulnerable to teardrop - or does my memory fail me?