From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar  7 06:54:06 2011
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E2A1065672;
	Mon,  7 Mar 2011 06:54:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from doug-optiplex.ka9q.net (hub.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F8911567D1;
	Mon,  7 Mar 2011 06:54:05 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4D74810D.3090604@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2011 22:54:05 -0800
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110304 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pav@FreeBSD.org
References: <201103062210.p26MANtg038763@repoman.freebsd.org>	
	<4D740EFA.9030908@FreeBSD.org>
	<1299451892.41675.39.camel@hood.oook.cz>
In-Reply-To: <1299451892.41675.39.camel@hood.oook.cz>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/rat Makefile distinfo pkg-descr
 pkg-plist
 ports/audio/rat30 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr ports/audio/speak_freely
 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/audio/vat Makefile distinfo
 pkg-descr ports/audio/xspeakfree ...
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree
	<cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 06:54:06 -0000

On 03/06/2011 14:51, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> I'm not opposed to it.

Thanks, done. :)

> Just note that marking a port DEPRECATED does not
> in any way alert existing users about it's forthcoming removal.

I know it's not a universal solution, but portmaster at least does bark 
if it encounters a port that is DEPRECATED, IGNORE, MOVED, etc.


Doug

-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/