Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 12:17:13 +0430 From: Hooman Fazaeli <hoomanfazaeli@gmail.com> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Is ZFS production ready? Message-ID: <4FE57481.90601@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211622570.3092@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <4FE2CE38.9000100@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211350250.2263@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4FE32C16.3050205@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211622570.3092@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I meant, is it now possible to have >2TB FS with UFS? On 6/21/2012 6:54 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, Hooman Fazaeli wrote: > >> On 6/21/2012 4:22 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>> stick with UFS. It JUST WORKS(R), and is trusty. >>> And it works fast. >>> >> What options are there for >2TB file systems with UFS? >> > the same as for <2TB filesystems. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FE57481.90601>