Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 23 Jun 2012 12:17:13 +0430
From:      Hooman Fazaeli <hoomanfazaeli@gmail.com>
To:        Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Is ZFS production ready?
Message-ID:  <4FE57481.90601@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211622570.3092@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References:  <4FE2CE38.9000100@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211350250.2263@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4FE32C16.3050205@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211622570.3092@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

I meant, is it now possible to have >2TB FS with UFS?

On 6/21/2012 6:54 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, Hooman Fazaeli wrote:
>
>> On 6/21/2012 4:22 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>>> stick with UFS. It JUST WORKS(R), and is trusty.
>>> And it works fast.
>>>
>> What options are there for >2TB file systems with UFS?
>>
> the same as for <2TB filesystems.
>




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FE57481.90601>