From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 13 11:13:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46E9106564A for ; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:13:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (tunnel490.ipv6.xs4all.nl [IPv6:2001:888:10:1ea::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 646968FC15 for ; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:13:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n5DBDgK7063642; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 13:13:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n5DBDgbl063641; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 13:13:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 13:13:42 +0200 From: Ruben de Groot To: Jos Chrispijn Message-ID: <20090613111342.GE54653@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , Jos Chrispijn , FreeBSD Questions References: <4A32B0DB.7010004@webrz.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A32B0DB.7010004@webrz.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on ei.bzerk.org X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (ei.bzerk.org [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 13 Jun 2009 13:13:45 +0200 (CEST) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Program update(s) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:13:48 -0000 On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 09:47:39PM +0200, Jos Chrispijn typed: > Can someone tell me why I have to recompile all related programs when I > upgrade to a newer version of Perl? How easy it would be that all these > 'to be recompiled' programs only were linked to just Perl instead of > Perl.x.x.x. Or is that a complete wrong way of approach? Can you guarantee that all these programs will work with perl.y.y.y ?