From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon May 19 16:24:00 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA25575 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 19 May 1997 16:24:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.crl.com (mail.crl.com [165.113.1.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA25531 for ; Mon, 19 May 1997 16:23:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conceptual.com ([209.60.202.194]) by mail.crl.com with SMTP id AA19132 (5.65c/IDA-1.5 for ); Mon, 19 May 1997 16:20:44 -0700 Received: from kofa (kofa.100mb.conceptual.com [10.0.1.3]) by conceptual.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id QAA01644; Mon, 19 May 1997 16:23:16 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <3380E0D6.EB2A5EC7@consys.com> Date: Mon, 19 May 1997 16:23:02 -0700 From: "Russell L. Carter" Organization: Conceptual Systems & Software X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.0b4 [en] (WinNT; I) Mime-Version: 1.0 To: sthaug@nethelp.no Cc: hutton@isi.edu, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: throughtput measurements for fast ethernet X-Priority: 3 (Normal) References: <199705161709.KAA05644@conceptual.com> <12250.864080883@verdi.nethelp.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk sthaug@nethelp.no wrote: > > > I was hoping for something more specific. My _first_ tests with > the 3com vx > > > driver for the 395 pci card on FreeBSD 2.2.1 are not showing good > results - > > > highest throughput for UDP 45Mbps. I should stress that these were > first tests. > > > > > > Has anyone any traffic measurements for any of the fast ethernet > drivers? > > > > What kind of main memory bandwidth can your motherboards sustain? A > > > good test is the stream benchmark from McCalpin. Many P6 > motherboards > > can sustain transfer rates which drive 100mb ethernet at full > throttle, > > but a lot of P5 motherboards cannot. 45Mbps is not unusual for > these. > > I doubt motherboards are the issue here. I've measured 79 Mbps between > > two P133s (430FX chipset), using SMC (21140 based) cards. This was > done > more than a year ago, and the results are in the Netperf database. I > got > the same figures with ttcp. > > Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no Well, it does matter. These had pipelined burst SRAM, right? Anything with async SRAM will run around 45Mbits/s with 21140 cards. The same CPU with PB-SRAM agrees with what you report. However, she mentioned that other interfaces weren't affected, so in this case it's not the motherboard, and since I haven't tested the throughput for the 3com driver I can't say for sure that it *isn't* the driver. Russell