From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 19 14:39:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AEDD16A4CE for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:39:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C728E43D1D for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:39:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i7JEd46o019667 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:39:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: current@freebsd.org From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:13:10 +0200." <20040819141310.GA756@gicco.homeip.net> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:39:04 +0200 Message-ID: <19666.1092926344@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk Subject: Re: [REVIEW/TEST] Rewritten floppy driver. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:39:06 -0000 In message <20040819141310.GA756@gicco.homeip.net>, Hanspeter Roth writes: > On Aug 19 at 15:43, Poul-Henning Kamp spoke: > >> >> Please review and test this patch: >> >> http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/fdc.patch > >Does it handle a write protected floppy that is attempted to be >mounted writable correctly? Yes, you shouldn't even be able to mount it. >If a write protected floppy is attempted to be mounted writable and >a write will be attempted on the floppy doesn't it prevent all other >mounted filesystems from being unmounted? I'm trying to get to where we can fix this sort of stuff properly :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.