From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 15:49:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C937AE5E for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 15:49:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com (mail-pa0-f54.google.com [209.85.220.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F2801431 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 15:49:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pacwv17 with SMTP id wv17so113046971pac.0 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 08:49:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2gkq65fi5HuWEuUJNn1HBUk1ucd0P+l2gWSaessF5QA=; b=NkL+2ufzHF8WPKNzQR4HJt5iH/VIIGdkv4FpbNqGZrD37slb/6kE45pF88q//p9rXL XGQl4XD5vtYovmQ37DqRXy8xav2a7L4NLtSdtpG5srXHXb4jDVER0qsAs7hJtghEf2pZ KzFitqqVljYouHnbXbbkuJvPp14X5GzPV3hSyvg7XNwsKIB1WeauPA7Y5juCnxs06PIS qAerKDbnZPZUKeDXY90M9PPDED+5Mfo2JK2ardv83wEAGPUG/YMAPorJYLh1HtIUfpH0 Xsa03abdKps8aNZEICjKU2jFnRdGTjijiwvvWPwiSHsFQJ/mOziTrEdSPnTGHd8Qjix1 44AA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlxujF0dlSktlBk05aeZ9z9EahIh2tJxaLqVInO17MFISTaGt2OcRKx3be0dLrc/JFcwP1U MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.232.194 with SMTP id tq2mr20280121pbc.90.1431358986320; Mon, 11 May 2015 08:43:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.102.99 with HTTP; Mon, 11 May 2015 08:43:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.102.99 with HTTP; Mon, 11 May 2015 08:43:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150511093100.GC53149@e-new.0x20.net> References: <554BB84F.7060605@FreeBSD.org> <554BCD4C.8090500@FreeBSD.org> <3137063.YOSa6Au8Xi@ralph.baldwin.cx> <554D1DD5.5080106@FreeBSD.org> <554E2221.1040105@FreeBSD.org> <20150511093100.GC53149@e-new.0x20.net> Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 08:43:06 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What to do about RCS/OpenRCS From: Jos Backus To: Lars Engels , freebsd-current , Lyndon Nerenberg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 15:49:30 -0000 On May 11, 2015 2:31 AM, "Lars Engels" wrote: > > On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 11:27:57AM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: > > Maybe off-topic, but functionality-wise it might make much more sense to > > import Fossil. RCS has too many limitations this day and age when better > > tools are available. Of course, this would require people to learn > > something new, which I know can be a challenge. > > I really like fossil. But it's still under development, so it would soon > be outdated. It's better installed from ports/packages. It seems OpenRCS is still under development ;-p It's better installed from ports/packages, too. It would give Fossil a recognition boost as a BSD-licensed DVCS. Jos