From owner-freebsd-security Fri Jan 12 9:31:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from osiris.ipform.ru (osiris.ipform.ru [212.158.165.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3BCF37B401 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 09:31:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from wp2 (localhost.ipform.ru [127.0.0.1]) by osiris.ipform.ru (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f0CHV5S63373 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 20:31:05 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from matrix@ipform.ru) Message-ID: <00aa01c07cbd$71209dc0$0c00a8c0@ipform.ru> From: "Artem Koutchine" To: Subject: Encrypted networked filesystem needed Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 20:31:03 +0300 Organization: IP Form MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello! I need a networked filesystem which tranfers files from host to host in encrypted manner or can be tunnelled over SSL (say, using stunnel). NFS cannot be tunneled even when run in TCP mode because of rpc stuff I also heard of and have read about AFS and CODA, but it seems like they do not support encryption, but maybe they could be tunneled. Samba CAN be tunnelled but, IMHO, Samba plain sux and we use it only for windows boxes which need to access unix files. So, is there a file system which support encryption and can AFS or CODA be tunneled? Can AFS and CODA even substitute NFS (in terms of functionality and convinices)? Best regards, Artem Koutchine To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message