From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 31 08:34:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE85316A46D for ; Thu, 31 May 2007 08:34:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stefan.lambrev@sun-fish.com) Received: from blah.sun-fish.com (blah.sun-fish.com [217.18.249.150]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49AD13C480 for ; Thu, 31 May 2007 08:34:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stefan.lambrev@sun-fish.com) Received: from blah.sun-fish.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blah.sun-fish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796F91B10EE8; Thu, 31 May 2007 10:34:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.1.1.2] (unknown [192.168.25.6]) by blah.sun-fish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 739911B10EE7; Thu, 31 May 2007 10:34:39 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <465E889E.9050008@sun-fish.com> Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 11:34:38 +0300 From: Stefan Lambrev User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jack Vogel References: <462E3B4A.5030307@sun-fish.com> <46595504.4060803@sun-fish.com> <2a41acea0705271034s79d6774dg2008a057831d9de2@mail.gmail.com> <4659C59C.9030208@sun-fish.com> <2a41acea0705271220w2239211bn1c582031607ca1eb@mail.gmail.com> <2a41acea0705291506w156ac4d8s88c0fdd1025e5141@mail.gmail.com> <2a41acea0705301142v68505a1cs674008165095a335@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0705301142v68505a1cs674008165095a335@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP on BLAH Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em0 failed to work at 1000baseTX. WAS [Re: em0 - bge0 failed to work at 1000baseTX] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 08:34:41 -0000 Jack Vogel wrote: > On 5/29/07, Jack Vogel wrote: >> On 5/27/07, Jack Vogel wrote: >> > On 5/27/07, Stefan Lambrev wrote: >> > > Hi Jack, >> > > >> > > Jack Vogel wrote: >> > > > Stefan, >> > > > >> > > > I am having a long weekend and am supposed to be doing >> > > > something other than this :) However, when I get back in the >> office >> > > > on Tuesday I will see if I can repro this, so just to make >> sure, tell >> > > > me what the PCI ID of the two cards are when it fails with Intel >> > > > on both sides, that should be easy. >> > > > >> > > > Jack >> > > this is the card that works in my tests: >> > > >> > > em1@pci4:0:1: class=0x020000 card=0x34768086 chip=0x10968086 >> rev=0x01 >> > > hdr=0x00 >> > > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' >> > > device = 'PRO/1000 EB Network Connection' >> > > class = network >> > > subclass = ethernet >> > > >> > > and this is the one that do not work at gigabit speed: >> > > >> > > em0@pci0:25:0: class=0x020000 card=0x2800103c chip=0x104a8086 >> rev=0x02 >> > > hdr=0x00 >> > > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' >> > > device = '82566DM Gigabit Network Connection' >> > > class = network >> > > subclass = ethernet >> > >> > OK, I will attempt to repro this on Tuesday, thanks Stefan. >> >> Good News, I have repro'd this on hardware here, so I'm actively >> debugging things now, hope its an easy fix... stay tuned. > > I have fixed the problem, I will be checking in that together with > a couple other minor bugs this afternoon sometime. > > Cheers, > > Jack Thank you very much for the help Jack :)) Unfortunately I'm off next four days and probably will not be able to test it before Monday. Btw any chances to have patch for releng_6 or the difference in the drivers is too big ? :)